Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +134%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
28
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Tahiti
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy