Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +7466%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
31W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy