Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro R5000 +112%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Remote
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT200B
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
289W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy