Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile +88%
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1002 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
16
960
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Baffin
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy