Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 450 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +27%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 450
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
10
960
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1024 GFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Baffin
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy