Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 645M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +140%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645M
0.544 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.672 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
544.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.69 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GK107
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N13P-GS
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy