Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +2565%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.96 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GT218
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N11M-GE1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy