Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +499%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jul 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G92B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy