Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc A780

AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Arc A780 +728%
18.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-512
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy