Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +2599%
16.79 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy