Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +5050%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy