Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +1175%
7.603 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
240
144
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT200B
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

185W
TDP
289W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy