Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +283%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Sep 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tonga
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy