Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1550MHz vs 1410MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +430%
12.63 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
768
280
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
24
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
DG1
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy