Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
2048 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (350W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +33%
14.75 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
6144
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
350W
900 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy