Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1785%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
51W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy