CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+3174%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro FX 3800M
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K500
5
NVIDIA Tesla C870 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
6
NVIDIA L40 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy