Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +3174%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy