Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +1543%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
837 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
30W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy