Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FireGL V3600

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +2318%
3.482 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
1024
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV630
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy