Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Intel GMA 3650

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Intel GMA 3650

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
864 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA 3650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile +9514%
3.942 TFLOPS
GMA 3650
0.041 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Oct 2008
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
1
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
640.0 MPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.560 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.96 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Cedarview
-
GPU Variant
-
Xe-LPG
Architecture
PowerVR SGX545
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

65W
TDP
13W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1
4.6
OpenGL
ES 2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy