Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro S9000

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +433%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
112
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy