Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +8300%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV620
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy