Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1710MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +2174%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Blender
A10G +2831%
3664
Quadro P620
125
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
9216
Shading Units
512
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GP107
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy