Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1935GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +41%
19.49 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
5120bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1935GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
7680
432
TMUs
240
160
ROPs
120
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy