Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (270W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR4-3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 48MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3365
1902
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +4%
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3365
18361
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +8%
19940
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
270 W
Power Consumption
360 W
81 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
FC-LGA4189
Package
FC-LGA6096

CPU Performance

2.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
96
64
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
48 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy