Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 2102 with 4 cores 2.9GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 2102 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR4-2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8.25MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 2102
894
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +132%
2075
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 2102
2849
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P +703%
22897
VS

General Parameters

Aug 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Skylake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 2066
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Skylake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
Intel Socket 2066
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
120 W
Power Consumption
360 W
66 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
484 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
FC-LGA2066
Package
FC-LGA6096

CPU Performance

2.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
4
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8.25 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
1
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
48
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy