NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+84%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1440
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
