NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+779%
5.468 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
30
2048
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
