NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+18221%
91.06 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
320
568
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV670
AD102
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
