AMD Radeon R5 M320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M320 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 M320 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock855MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M320
+2635%
0.547 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
-
855 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
8
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
17.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
547.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Jet
GPU Name
G98
Jet PRO
(216-0856040)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0
