Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (2200MHz vs 1000MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
3.379 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +21%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Navi II IGP
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
3GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
384bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
375W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy