Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (2200MHz vs 1219MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M +170%
3.379 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2017
Navi II IGP
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy