AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2200MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
+13%
3.379 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon 680M
2339
GeForce GTX 1650
+52%
3566
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon 680M
1087
GeForce GTX 1650
+47%
1606
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2019
Navi II IGP
Generation
GeForce 16
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rembrandt
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
