AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
+3613%
3.379 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Navi II IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Rembrandt
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
