Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2200MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
3.379 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +28%
4.339 TFLOPS
Blender
Radeon 680M
244
A16 PCIe +109%
510
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Navi II IGP
Generation
Tesla
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
12
RT Cores
10
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
Unknown
208 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy