AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 660M and a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon 660M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 25W)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (2040MHz vs 1900MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 660M
1.459 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
+114%
3.133 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Rembrandt
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1900 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
2GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
32bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
12
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
45.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
2.918 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1459 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rembrandt
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
210 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
