NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+2228%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
G94
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
