NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (1582MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+82%
6.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+86%
546
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1278 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK110B
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
