NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
+204%
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
