NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
+1434%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
32
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
247W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
