NVIDIA P106 100 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2130MHz vs 1709MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P106 100
4.375 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+174%
12 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
P106 100
4068
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+100%
8147
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
P106 100
1866
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+92%
3601
Blender
P106 100
406
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+552%
2649
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
AD107
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
