Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
8144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+24480%
24.58 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
8192
Shading Units
48
512
TMUs
8
512
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
19W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
