NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+14%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Baffin
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
