Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 545 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 545
0.415 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2791%
12 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 545
237
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +3337%
8147

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 500
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
22
144
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
17.28 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
34.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net