NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+7208%
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
