NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 640GB)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+271%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
800
28
TMUs
40
20
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
RV770
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
