AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 176W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+435%
10.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
May 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2055 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2635 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2190 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
280.3GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
168.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
337.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.59 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.79 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
674.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
176W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 23
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 23 KXT
(215-130000136)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
