AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
+3650%
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireStream
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV620
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
