AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 180W)
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
P30PH
+893%
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
180W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
