AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
T600 Mobile
+28%
2.527 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.12 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.053 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.527 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
40W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
TU117
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
